Archive for Government

790 results.

US building military base in Afghanistan near Iran border

May18
by admin on May 18, 2013 at 6:32 pm
Posted In: Warmongering, Worlds Policemen


The United States is building a military base in Afghanistan near the border with the Islamic Republic of Iran,Press TV reports.

Press TV’s correspondent in Afghanistan said the base is being built in an area known as Chahlang in Afghanistan’s Farah Province. The site of the construction is three kilometers from the Iranian border.

US building military base in Afghanistan near Iran border

According to information obtained by Press TV, the US forces have already constructed a communications tower and dug some channels in the ground at the site of the base.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai said on May 9 that the US had demanded to keep nine military bases across the war-torn country, adding that, “We are in very serious and delicate negotiations with America.”

On Thursday, however, White House Spokesman Jay Carney rejected Karzai’s remarks, saying that Washington “does not seek permanent military bases in Afghanistan.”

Emal Feizi, a spokesman for the Afghan president, later denied Carney’s claims and said Washington has even chosen some cities for establishing the bases.

On May 2, 2012, Washington and Kabul signed a deal that authorized the presence of US troops for a period of 10 years after 2014, which was the original date agreed earlier for the departure of all foreign combat troopers from Afghanistan. Afghanistan’s Parliament approved the pact on May 26.

Karzai had confirmed for the first time in 2011 that the administration of US President Barack Obama had demanded the establishment of a system of permanent US military bases across Afghanistan.

The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001 as part of Washington’s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity remains high across the country despite the presence of many US-led foreign troops.

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News

May18
by admin on May 18, 2013 at 6:25 pm
Posted In: Big Brother, Losing our Freedom, Manipulation
Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls The News

These three scandals have led the media to rebel against the Obama administration in a way that it has not done in the past while at the same time forcing the media to admit some damning facts about the way news is truly originated in America.

The media’s reporting on the scandals has provided the public insights into the operations of the incestuous relationship between the press and the government.

Such revelations clearly suggest the corporate media is telegraphing to the public the American government has just gone way too far out of control.

These three scandals forced the corporate media to admit openly what has long been dismissed as merely conspiracy theory —  that the corporate media is now openly admitting that they are in fact controlled stenographers that do nothing more than echo pre-scripted narratives outlined in talking points created by the rulers of America’s shadow government.

To be absolutely clear, that is not hyperbole nor is it speculation. It’s a fact that the corporate media is now openly admitting their reporting on the Benghazi scandal over the last 8 months has been merely the parroting of statements given by government officials who were merely echoing talking points issued by the CIA.

By now just about every news organization has repeatedly reported the story about how those CIA issued talking points were edited 12 times by various people in the shadow government before they were given to figureheads to relay to the press who in turned echoed them to the masses.

This is a direct admission that the false narrative about Benghazi that has been shoved down our throat as fact by the corporate media was nothing more than CIA issued talking points.

Since subliminal manipulation the consciousness of the masses is now a science that the government has completely mastered, let make make sure you have been deprogrammed before continuing.

Wake up – Every news outlet in the country is admitting 8 months of news reports about Benghazi were nothing more than the parroting of CIA issued talking points.

Read more:  http://goo.gl/qlunq

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

Read Dan Brown’s latest book Inferno?… if so, this will spook you

May18
by admin on May 18, 2013 at 6:24 pm
Posted In: Government

Something is rotten in the Denver airport (13 Photos)

MARCH 8, 2012 | IN: CREEPY, HIGH-RES, WTF

FOLLOW  ON TAPITURE

View As Slideshow

Located 25 miles from Denver on a plot of land encompassing 53 square miles (twice the size of Manhattan), sits one of the most curious airpots in the world, The Denver International Airport. Leo and I had a long layover at the airport last weekend. As we walked around, we couldn’t help but notice that something about this place isn’t right. So I did some digging.

*Note: I’m not a conspiracy guy in any way, I fancy myself as more of a beer drinker, so take this post more in the spirit of WTF than an accusation. But anybody who has flown through Denver Airport will tell you this place is a few fries short of a Happy Meal.

Let’s start at the beginning. Denver Airport was commissioned in 1989 at a cost of 1.7 billion dollars. The airport was finished in 1995, 2 years late, at a cost of 4.8 BILLION dollars, roughly 3.1 billion over budget, like ya’ do. The airport was privately funded, and nobody really knows by whom. A marker stone in the terminal reads the airport was funded by The New World Airport Commission.

It should also be noted that Denver had a completely functional airport, Stapleton, that many people liked just fine. Stapleton was only 6 miles from Denver after all.

There was really no need to build the airport in the first place… unless you needed a construction project up above to mask a larger construction project happening down below. And this is where the conspiracies begin.

Many people believe that the largest underground bunker in the world lies beneath the Denver airport. Specifically a 360,000 sq. foot bunker, built by the New World Order to house the elites in case of economic collapse or nuclear holocaust. The construction of the Denver airport was necessitated as a dumb show; an above ground construction project to hide the the creation of something that lies beneath, hiding in plain sight.

Hints that the Denver airport is hiding something big are everywhere. Visitors to the Denver Airport will immediately notice a number of mysterious masonic symbols and murals clearly depicting the end of the word. They’re hard to miss. Many believe these murals hold a deeper meaning which can be gleaned by the initiated of the New World Order and Freemasons. Let’s have a look.

Finally, let’s return to those bunkers. The photo above is a blueprint of 5 buildings that were mysteriously buried during the early days of construction on the Denver Airport. These five large buildings were fully constructed and subsequently deemed to have been ‘positioned incorrectly.’

Rather than being demolished, the buildings were ordered to be buried, yes buried. The ‘underground bases’, as they are referred, are currently being used as “storage” according to airport authorities. This fact is not debated. We already know there is an underground structure beneath the airport. The real question is how deep the worm hole goes. We may never know…

UPDATE BY LEO: President Obama was in Denver Sept 27th last year when Comet Elenin passed by the earth, “barely missing” us by 22 miles. Some say, that if the comet would have struck earth, it’s back to the stone-age for us. Nonetheless, their was a chance that it could have hit and President Obama was conveniently ushered to Denver… which, in my opinion, adds more to the existence of not only a military bunker, but also the largest, most advanced bunker in the US -because the President wouldn’t go to some half-ass bunker if there was a threat of complete world destruction. Just sayin..

UPDATE 2: Just got a weird phone call from “Government Affairs” (whatever that is) on our office phone caller ID and they hung up after we answered. If this post disappears for some reason tomorrow, you know why..

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

44% of Republicans Say Armed Rebellion is Coming

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 2:13 pm
Posted In: Government

Everyone else is just getting by, hoping the pizza delivery guy gets here before American Idle (sic) starts while answering silly telephone poll questions with silly answers to screw up the results.

While 44% of registered Republican voters indicated that they believed armed rebellion would soon be a reality in the U.S., just 18% of Democrats agreed. As for Independent voters, 27% indicated that guns would soon be used to settle the country’s political problems.

The partisan gap on the question of whether armed revolution will soon play a role in America’s political history mirrors the differences in opinion on gun control. While 50% of those surveyed said that new gun control legislation was necessary to protect the public, just 24% of Republicans said new laws were needed. A whopping 73% of Democrats favored new legislation, the survey found.

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

How the FBI Wants to Penalize Internet Companies for Providing “Too Much” Security

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 2:01 pm
Posted In: Losing our Freedom

Posted on May 13, 2013

1

Remember my recent post titled: Former FBI Agent: All Phone Conversations are Recorded and Stored?  Well now they now want to ensure doing the same on the internet is as easy as possible.  The latest proposal by the FBI, which would require companies to provide a backdoor for the feds to spy on American citizens on the internet, has been covered extensively in the mainstream media over the past couple of weeks, first in the Washington Post and then later in the New York Times.  It centers around this push to make communications on the internet “wiretap capable” and would impose fines of $25,000 per day for companies that do not comply with Big Brother.  Julian Sanchez of Wired has written and excellent article explaining how this proposal would not only crush privacy rights of law abiding citizens, but would also help cyber criminals, enable totalitarian governments, make the internet less secure and stifle the remnants of innovation that remain in the economy.  Oh, and unsurprisingly, Obama backs the proposal.  My favorite excerpts:

The FBI has some strange ideas about how to “update” federal surveillance laws: They’re calling for legislation to penalize online services that provide users with too much security.

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

Study: Public companies that did the most lobbying easily beat the S&P 500 from 2007-2012

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Posted In: Corruption

Credit: Strategas

Credit: Strategas

Pethokoukis, Economics, Regulation

Study: Public companies that did the most lobbying easily beat the S&P 500 from 2007-2012

 | May 16, 2013, 2:29 pmIn 2009, Strategas Group realized there was going to be a lot more government intervention into the economy, and stocks of companies that exhibited “the greatest lobbying intensity” might outperform the broad market. So the firm created a 50-stock “lobbying … read more >

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

Pentagon Unilaterally Grants Itself Authority Over ‘Civil Disturbances

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 11:49 am
Posted In: Police State

by Jed Morey, Long Island Press:

The manhunt for the Boston Marathon bombing suspects offered the nation a window into the stunning military-style capabilities of our local law enforcement agencies. For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled“Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

US Government Begins BitCoin Crackdown

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 11:01 am
Posted In: Losing our Freedom

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 05/15/2013 – 14:02 

As we first noted here (regulation) and here (supervision), the US government has been gradually encroaching on the independence and freedom of the virtual currency. This week, as The Washington Post reports, the government escalated. The feds took action against Mt. Gox, the world’s leading Bitcoin exchange. Many people use Dwolla, a PayPal-like payment network, to send dollars to their Mt. Gox accounts. They then use those dollars to buy Bitcoins. On Tuesday, Dwolla announced that it had frozen Mt. Gox’s account at the request of federal investigators. It’s the first federal action against the currency. Considering the great antipathy the central planners have toward such legacy money as gold and silver, is it any surprise that they would move aggressively and rapidly to halt the emergence of yet another alternative to fiat, especially one which the ECB made it very clear will not be tolerated in an insolvent world. Because all is fair in preserving the FIATH…

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

Cops Bust Into Home Without Warrant – Taze Homeowners

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 10:21 am
Posted In: Police State

In a shocking video of police brutality, police in Cotati, California respond to an anonymous call about alleged domestic violence by kicking in the door before tazing a man and his wife.

The officers showed up at the doorstep of the home, much to the surprise of the homeowners after a call was placed that alleged the couple was involved in a domestic violence dispute. The homeowner was aware that police officers were on the lawn and began to document the incident by video.

The law enforcement officers advised the homeowners that they would be entering the home (without a warrant, I might add) due to the anonymous call. At this point both the man and woman informed the officers that they had merely an argument and that no domestic violence had taken place.

“Why are you guys not coming out?” one of the officers questioned.

The gentleman then states that he is not going to comply with the order “Because we don’t live in a police state, sir. Martial law has not been established in this country.”

The police were obviously taken back when the homeowners refused to obey their orders and exit their home. In response, the man said that it was his Fourth Amendment right to be safe and secure in his home and the look on the police officers face is priceless.

He then orders them to get on the ground with their hands behind their backs and says, “We’re gonna kick in the door.”

However, the jack booted thugs outside his home were not just going to go away quietly. They took matters into their own hands, and I might add unlawfully. They kicked in the door and began taxing the couple.

They then attempted to justify their tyrannical actions. Police have sought to justify their actions based upon welfare and safety of children living in the home. The Daily Sheepleadds:

Many have speculated as to why the police felt they needed to unlawfully enter the home, with some claiming they could have felt the children lives were in danger yet the fact of the matter is the children were clearly fine and, if anything, would be psychologically and possibly even physically hurt by police breaking down their door and attacking their parents.

However, under Florida v. J.L. (March 28, 2000), “the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that anonymous tips are not sufficient grounds to constitute probable cause for a search. Judge Ginsburg, writing for the Supreme Court, stated, “Such an exception would enable any person seeking to harass another to set in motion an intrusive, embarrassing police search of the targeted person simply by placing an anonymous call.…”

So my fellow Americans, understand this, these officers are fortunate the homeowner didn’t shoot them dead as soon as they kicked in the door. I smell a huge lawsuit going on. This is what happens when you allow anonymous tips to take place without evidence. These officers could have stood outside the door, called for a warrant and then, if a judge would actually issue them one, shown the warrant to the homeowners and I’m sure they would have allowed them to investigate. Otherwise, these men broke the law and the real victims in this case are the law abiding homeowners. 

Personally, each of these officers should be removed from the force and a lawsuit should be engaged against each of these officers and their superior for not putting a stop to it. As long as men like this are allowed to be “law enforcement officers,” it gives those who are good law enforcement officers a bad name and allows for more violations of the law by those who are sworn to uphold it.

Cotati Police Department

Address: 203 W Sierra Ave, Cotati, CA 94931

Phone:(707) 792-4611

Send to Kindle
 Comment 

A New Alternative: Constitutional Governance

May16
by admin on May 16, 2013 at 9:30 am
Posted In: Government

 

Jefferson_Anti-TyrannyBoard475O

“To destroy the structure of apathy by stirring up dissatisfaction and discontent; disrupt existing complacent expectations, and breaking down the individualistic orientations of community residents.”

America, the above quote is from a college text book entitled, “The practice of Macro Social Work.” For those of you who may not be familiar with the term Macro it generally means gaining a perspective of how certain issues affect society as a whole. Armed with this knowledge it is safe to assume then that this quote is meant to be applied to a whole community. The quote itself is a “social change” strategy generally employed by community organizers called institutional deviance and it is being taught to your children from biased left wing professors who believe in collectivism as opposed to the constitution. The strategy originates from the Alinsky method and is generally used to get people so upset and angry over issues they don’t understand that they will typically follow anyone with a different alternative. Kind of puts the phrase “Fundamentally transform the United states of America” into new perspective doesn’t it?

Send to Kindle
 Comment